Quantum Learning Rotating Header Image

Posts under ‘Methods and approaches’

Conflict Is Not The Problem

Conflict gets a lot of press, most of it bad, and I’ve often wondered why that is.

It seems to me that conflict is a natural consequence of the wonderful array of difference between us. Imagine a world without difference – horrible! More than that, I believe conflict is a huge source of creativity and energy for constructive action. Where there’s difference, conflict is never far away and I’d prefer to embrace that than avoid it.

Conflict isn’t the problem. How we react and deal with conflict is.

The ‘traditional’ approach to conflict is two sided – ‘my way’ and ‘your way’. In fact, there’s a third side – the solution, the ‘way forward’ or ‘our way’. Conflicts can only be solved creatively and peacefully if we can put our energies into finding that third way.

It’s not easy, not because it’s hard, but because our conditioning and our egos get in the way.

What I learned as a kid

The main conclusion I formed as a kid about how to deal with conflict was that it required the skillful or intelligent use of force: either physical or psychological. Films, TV shows and comic books were my staple entertainment diet, feeding me a picture of conflict as a confrontation between opposing sides (usually one ‘good’ and one ‘bad’). The two combatants dealt with their differences by battling it out – with words, fists, guns or armies – until one side emerged victorious. Winning was for heroes, losing for suckers!

At school (and at home too!) I learned how to argue a position, debate a motion or prove a hypothesis. None of these are particularly creative in that they tend to be about rehashing existing knowledge rather than creating anything new. Not always, of course, but how often in your own academic life did you create something completely new?

It’s not my intention to blame the media or education system, just to point out the popular image of conflict resolution. We’re just not taught constructive ways.

But they do exist and, I believe involve three key steps:

Step 1 Give up attachment to ‘my way’

This part is 100% in my control and, theoretically at least, the easiest.

Some people interpret this as giving in, which is not what I mean. Giving in, or avoiding conflict (for example, to maintain harmony), is a perfectly valid option though not without significant risks. It could be the start of a slippery path for later abuse of my goodwill and perceived weakness. I certainly don’t recommend doing this regularly in any close or important relationship – unless you want to be a doormat.

What I mean is letting go of my attachment to my position. Accepting that I only have part of the picture and that any solution (if that’s what we’re aiming at) might be different from what I have in mind.

I prefer to get clear for myself what’s at stake for me. What’s really important to me in this situation?

Security? Respect? Love? Understanding? Freedom? Creating something new?

Some people call these my interests, others my needs or values. By getting clear about these, I’m more likely to open to the possibility that ‘my way’ is not the ‘only way’ and, indeed, might not even be the ‘best way’.

It helps to do this if I can loosen the grip of my ego.

Step 2 Persuade you to give up attachment to ‘your way’

This can be the hard part and where things can get a bit sticky and messy, unless I’m really skilled and have earned a lot of trust from you. I’m trying to get you to do what I’ve done for myself in the first step.

Some things that may help (none of these are guaranteed!):

  • empathy … you’re more likely to loosen your attachment if you sense that I’m genuinely interested in, and understand, your needs and interests
  • assertiveness … if you believe that I’m not going to give up my core needs and interests you’re more likely to take me seriously
  • openness to discuss … if you hear that I’m willing and interested to explore a way forward that embraces both our needs and interests you’re more likely to co-operate
  • patience … if you see that I’m willing to invest time in this and not rush either of us to a quick fix you’re more likely to invest as well
  • honesty … if you hear that I’m telling you the truth, even (or especially) when it’s unpleasant then you’re more likely to trust me.

There may well be times when I just can’t get you to give up your attachment to ‘your way or no way’. I believe in those situations my obligation is to protect my own interests and needs, whilst doing everything I can not to damage you. Walking away from the situation, forcefully defending myself or surrendering to you are all possible strategies.

Again, my ego will surely have something to say!

Step 3 Work on the solution together

This is the fun part.

We’ve built trust, we’ve got energy, we’ve got mutual understanding and we’ve got all the interests and needs on the table.

Now’s the time to create ‘our way’ and we’ve already got two great ideas to start us off – ‘my way’ and ‘your way’.

What would the world look like if everyone approached conflict this way?

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

Me, you and us

Some time ago I read ‘In Perfect Timing’, the autobiography of Peter Caddy, one of the founders of the Findhorn Community in Scotland (if you get a chance to visit I highly recommend this place). In 1945 he was stationed in Burma and he describes a trip from Rangoon to Puri, on the Bay of Bengal, where he had agreed to meet his friend Bill.

“I lay on my bedroll, drinking tea and watched the colourful panorama pass by the window: green fields, young wheat, yellow mustard, rustic dwellings and attractive wells, all set off against a beautiful sky that gave way to the sunset. When we stopped at a station I was captivated by the kaleidoscopic scene, full of interest and excitement – crowds of different races, pedlars, gurus with their chelas, fakirs with huge snakes around their necks, vendors selling sweetmeats, brahmins, beggars, betel-nut sellers – the whole sub-continent, it seemed, represented in a single setting. I was entranced by the whole journey.

He then meets Bill in the hotel in Puri, as agreed, and asks him about his trip.

“”A bloody awful one” he replied. “There was so much rattling and yelling, the noise was unbearable; the flies were awful, the people smelt almost as badly as the shit – ” he went on and on about it.

I then discovered that we had both travelled on the same train.”
I love this story. The conclusion Peter then draws is that I attract what I look for. When I look for the negative – that’s what I get. Look for the positive and I’ll find that.

Collecting the pieces of the puzzle

I draw another conclusion from this story.

All of us perceive the world through our own senses and react to them in our own unique way. Put any two people in the same situation and they’ll experience it differently. All the time. Who’s experience is the right one? The answer, of course, is both are right … and neither are right. Each of us has only a small piece of the whole picture, one element of the jigsaw puzzle.

I’m faced with this moment by moment and I’ve basically got two choices:

1   Try to convince the world that my piece of the puzzle is the only piece.

2   Try to collect as many pieces as possible to make sense of the picture.

Which is the sane approach and which is the commonest approach?

As the old saying goes ‘Common sense isn’t very common’!

One of several important things I picked up at the ‘Big Mind‘ retreat in Ameland was the importance of how I use  language. It wasn’t new to me, but a very clear reminder about using personal pronouns – especially first and second person (‘I’ and ‘You’).

I try to be very careful in my writing about how I use personal pronouns. Talking about ‘I’ and ‘Me’ does sound to me a bit egocentric at times but it’s very deliberate. When I use the first person I’m attempting to convey my experiences, my views, my piece of the jigsaw puzzle. If I was to use the second person, the risk is that you might hear me as trying to impose my truth onto you. And if it doesn’t agree with your view then you’re likely to have a defensive reaction.

Compare for example:

“… I attract what I look for. When I look for the negative – that’s what I get. Look for the positive and I’ll find that.”

with

“… you attract what you look for. When you look for the negative – that’s what you get. Look for the positive and you’ll find that.”

The difference is subtle but, I believe, crucial for reducing the amount of violence in the world.

The second sounds to me more like a lecture, a lesson for you about a universal truth. You may well agree, in which case we probably stop exploring the idea and congratulate each other that we’re like minded people. Neither of us learns much. On the other hand you may disagree and we’re more likely to start a debate about which of us has ‘the truth’. We may learn something from each other, but debate tends be confrontational rather than exploratory and often turns into argument.

I much prefer the first because, even when we disagree, the chances are that you’ll find it more inviting to share how you see it and I can learn and add your view to my own, and vice versa. We both pick up another piece of the puzzle of life.

Personal pronouns – the solution to peace?

I used, of course, a very mild example. Consider though the conflicts in the world.

Most (if not all) have their roots in two sides trying to impose their truth on the other side. It basically boils down to fighting about which side has the greatest claim on a piece of land, the right ideology or has superior racial roots.

How different would the world be if we all were seeking to understand each other instead of trying to educate each other?

It could be that paying attention to personal pronouns saves lives!

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

Insults, nonviolence and fish

I’ve been insulted many times in my life and some I even got to hear about. I also get lots of feedback and not all of it easy to hear.

nonviolence, difficult message

If you’re like me, then you’ll have developed habits around dealing with these difficult messages and  automatic responses make it hard to remember there’s a choice about how to react. My own habit was to go into silent shock and criticise myself with some internal finger pointing.

Where did this habit come from?

The first part of my adult life was spent trying to please others: subjects I studied, career (accounting, of all things!), job, buying a house, getting married, running a car. All of this was to keep the people in my world happy. None of it really made me happy, but what the hell if everyone else is happy!

With this motivation, any attack, criticism or insult went right to my core. I was failing to please someone so there must be something wrong with me! Ahhhhhh!!!!!!! As you can probably guess, my self esteem was not sky high with this approach to life!

What changed? One thing was when I discovered* that I have 4 broad choices in hearing these difficult messages.

  1. Attack the message giver
  2. Attack myself
  3. Listen to myself
  4. Listen to the message giver

An example might help.

I was in my early thirties and my assistant at the time had just made a huge mess of arranging a conference I was responsible for. I knew it and she knew it and it was one of those situations that, if undealt with immediately, could have wrecked my career. I stayed very calm, we fixed the problem  and then had a ‘review’ of this major mess up. She sat there quivering with nerves as I started, very calmly and logically to go through what had happened and what we could learn from it. After about 5 minutes she could stand it no longer and blurted out,

“I messed up. We both know it. Any NORMAL person would have got angry and shouted at me. But not you. You are such a COLD FISH – it’s impossible to work with you!”

Hmmmm, that was difficult to hear.

How could I have reacted?

1   Go on the attack – with her

It was her that screwed things up, not me! How dare she criticise me? She’s completely incompetent and if I hadn’t stayed cool, calm and collected there’s no way we’d have recovered from the mess she’d caused. I’m not cold! I’m in control … and that’s what a good manager needs to be, especially with someone as useless as her! Grrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!

I suspect both of us would have ended up worse off with this approach. But isn’t this pretty common? … after all, attack is apparently the best form of defence.

2   Go on the attack – with myself

She’s absolutely right. Any one with balls would have at least raised their voice. What a weak, cowardly person I am. I’ll never make it any further as a manager – she needs strong, assertive leadership. Not only that but I’m devoid of emotion generally. Nothing affects me. Am I dead?

This was what I did at the time. Fortunately I managed to transform it later as it didn’t help my self esteem too much.

3   Listen – to myself

I’ve not heard anyone say that before and I don’t like hearing it. I’m confused and not sure if she’s talking only about this situation or about working with me in general. I’d like to be understood that I was trying my best to solve the problem and I really care about this work. I’d also like her to hear that I care about her and I don’t consider losing my cool to be respectful.

Now that’s a bit softer! I’m neither agreeing or disagreeing but just opening myself into an enquiring frame and with this energy I might discover something useful about myself in this feedback.

4   Listen – to her

Wow, she seems really upset about this. I guess she would have liked to have done a great job and she’s disappointed about what happened. Maybe she’s also looking for more passion and energy in her work with me. Perhaps she wants honest, direct feedback and communication.

Again that’s softer. With this energy I might discover something useful about her from this feedback. For sure we’re both more likely to get something out of the situation and maybe learn about each other.

I’m not claiming that 3 or 4 are easy, and it requires skill and presence to choose these responses over  attacking. What I’ve written here are more like internal monologues and choosing if and how to verbalise the response is another skill to develop.

What I can say is that when I have chosen 3 or 4 the difficult message has always turned out to be the start of an important and meaningful exchange.

How do you habitually react to difficult messages? Does it work for you?

*at a workshop on Nonviolent Communication
Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

The Big Issue – changing to ‘yes’

I’m often surprised by how small things can be those making the greatest difference to our lives.

A few days ago I saw Jim Carrey’s latest film, ‘Yes Man’ while on a trip to Oxford in the UK. The main character is a compulsive ‘No-man’. He says ‘No’ to invitations, to loan applications (he works in a bank which I found ironically topical) and he says ‘No’ to beggars on the street. After a self-help seminar he agrees to become a ‘Yes-man’ and agree to everything instead. Once he starts saying ‘Yes’, his life, of course, turns around and he begins enjoying himself again.

It wasn’t an original or memorable film and I was disturbed in one scene by the behaviour towards a muslim woman. Putting that to one side, I found the central premise of saying ‘YES’ to life very appealing.

The following day I passed a homeless guy selling ‘The Big Issue’. For those who’ve not heard of it, I’ll digress for a moment:

“The Big Issue was set up in 1991 to provide homeless and vulnerably housed people with the opportunity to earn a legitimate income. … Big Issue vendors buy the magazine for £0.70 and sell it for £1.50, keeping the £0.80 per copy.”

Not only is it a very worthy idea, the magazine itself is well written and entertaining. What’s not to like about it?

As I was saying, I passed this guy standing on the cold Oxford street holding copies of the magazine.

“Big Issue, sir?” he asked.

I turned my head to look him in the eye (I like to show respect to everyone) and heard an automatic response leave my lips.

“No, thank you,” and I walked on, quickening my step a little.

A few metres on I stopped in my tracks, Jim Carrey’s face flashing in front of me. Normally I’d be very worried about that but it reminded me that every request I’m offered is a chance to say ‘Yes’. Agreeing to buy the magazine might appear to be only a small opportunity but I can’t see into the future, so I really have no way of knowing. What might appear to be small now may turn into something bigger tomorrow.

I turned round and walked back to the homeless guy who was now hopping from one foot to the other in an attempt to keep warm.

“I changed my mind,” I said, handing over a £2.00 coin, not wanting any change.

“Thank you!” said the young man, clearly delighted. I felt he really meant it.“That’s only the second I’ve sold all day. Many thanks.”

It was a small amount of money for me and I have no idea what that gesture meant for this fellow human being. I don’t know who he was, what he used that money for or why he was on the street. I don’t even know if I made any difference at all to his life.

What I do know is that I felt great.  Not about the money or the magazine, but about the shift from ‘No’ to ‘Yes’. My initial ‘No’ was a closing down, a retreat from another human being. It was a rejection of an honest request and I was a little smaller as a result of that ‘No’, and so was the homeless guy.

When I turned it into ‘Yes’ I opened up, I both gave and received. I made a brief connection with another soul and I made a difference. The size of the difference is unimportant because I was a little bigger as a result of that ‘Yes’ … and so was the homeless guy.

Jim – you are always welcome to remind me to say ‘Yes’ to life. Just next time could you whisper in my ear? Your face flashing in front of me is a bit scary!

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

New approach to resolutions game

If you’ll indulge me a little I’m going to briefly jump on the ‘New Year Resolutions’ bandwagon.

Beginning of 2009 seems like a good time to look at those resolutions for the coming year! Just like most everyone else, though, I’m a past master at making and breaking resolutions.

This year I’m trying a new approach. My resolution is not about specific intentions or actions but about developing a habit.

Every day I’m going to choose one small thing to nurture myself in some way. And by small, I really do mean tiny.

Today, for example, I set a goal of drinking 6 glasses of water (5 down … 1 to go!). I haven’t decided for tomorrow yet, but it could be take a walk round the apartment block, reading a couple of pages of a spiritual text, meditating for 5 minutes or turning off the lights if I’m not using them.

My aim is to develop a greater awareness of what I’m doing to feed myself physically, intellectually, emotionally and spiritually. I figure that by the end of the year I’ll be celebrating a minimum of 365 small, positive steps in my life.

Now that can’t be a bad thing!

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites