Quantum Learning Rotating Header Image

Posts from ‘December, 2008’

How hard should you smack your children?

In doing a bit of research for this article I was horrified at the volume of stuff out there promoting the use of corporal punishment (I delude myself that everyone sees the world the same way as I do!). I was in a state of shock and disbelief reading such things as this, from Gospel Way (a site with around 4 million visitors):

But if the child isn’t doing what you told him to do, your job isn’t done yet, no matter how much he cries. Punish him some more till he obeys you!

My guess is that when you read those sentences you’ll either nod in approval or raise your eyes in horror. There’s just not much room for sitting on the fence, especially if you are a parent yourself. According to several surveys of parents the majority seem to be in favour of smacking, though it’s banned in many countries.

With many reactions bubbling up inside and with outrage in my heart, I decided to go for the jugular and write this article to convert all you evil child-spankers to change your inhuman ways. My approach was going to be to convince you with the quality of my rhetoric and an appeal to your humanity.

Then a voice in my ear whispered:

That ain’t gonna work, buddy!

Those whispering voices are sometimes worth listening to!

No amount of rationality, research or conviction will sway any parent when it comes to this topic. I wouldn’t be swayed by logic or expert opinion – so how could I expect anyone else to be? There’s also no point taking a moralistic route by arguing that hitting people (including children) is either ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. Many parents spank kids whether I like it or not and no matter how ‘wrong’ I personally believe it is. Me believing it’s ‘wrong’ simply comes face to face with someone believing it’s ‘right’. Complete dead end. Writing with my original intent would be a waste of time and disrespectful to anyone reading this who thinks differently to me.

I decided to change focus and, instead, poke around the subject and maybe scratch under the surface a bit. It still carries my own anti-smacking bias – I’m only human after all. I believe that whenever something disturbs me then the most fruitful place to look is inside myself and peel back a few layers to see what’s lurking underneath. I can’t change anyone unless I’ve had a long hard look at myself – even then the chances are small!

Why does smacking bug me so much?

Insecurity as a parent

I’m quite insecure about whether I’m doing a good job as a parent. I want what’s best for my children and there are so many grey areas, so much conflicting advice and so much I can’t influence. In the face of all the contradictions, it’s comforting to have at least one area where I have strong beliefs about what I’m doing. It’s not only that I believe I’m right (I am humble enough to admit that I’m imperfect), it gives me one solid principle on which I base much of my ‘good-enough’ parenting.

I will never intentionally inflict pain on my children.

I may cause pain by accident or ignorance or when I just don’t know what else to do but the intention of spanking is to inflict pain. Spanking is a direct attack on my deep conviction and parenting principles.

My guess is that if you are attached to spanking then you have equally strong (but different) principles and you are just as convinced that spanking is good for children, maybe even necessary.

Loyalty to my parents

My parents used spanking as a punishment. It was infrequent and consisted of a short, sharp slap across my buttocks or thigh. They still believe (as their parents did) that spanking is a necessary part of parenting.

The loyal child in me defends my parents and how they brought me up while the angry teenager in me rebels against them. Through the middle of those conflicting urges is a desire to find my own, mature adult way. I’m trying to find my own way of parenting whilst defending my parents. I read several comments along similar lines:

My brother and sister and me were all smacked as kids, and it never did us any harm.

… people do bring up law abiding and well behaved people without smacking them as children. My parents managed to do this …

I find it understandable to respect and defend my parents. I also think there’s a time to let go of what my parents taught me and make my own decisions. How can we evolve as a species if we simply repeat what our parents did?

Discipline and obedience

The whole point of smacking is to teach or discipline our children to obey us:

… all children have rebellion in them and when it surfaces, it is our duty as parents to drive it out of them. We are to do this by punishing them with a whack on the buttocks with a small reed-like rod. … A spanking should be swift and cause short lived pain that makes a point. That point is that the small pain they feel now will prevent them from feeling great pain by the act they are committing, which could cause them loss of their lives in some cases. (For instance, if a child tries to run across the street, they could be run over and killed.)

from Bible.

What I read here is that it is my duty as parent to teach my children to become obedient adults and one way for them to learn is though punishment.

Personally, I do NOT want my children to grow into obedient puppets in fear of authority. I want my children to grow up equipped for the lives they choose to live. I want them to respect those with more experience and wisdom (authority), gently challenge authority to find their own truth and make and take responsibility for their own choices.

I see my role as parent is to create safety for them to explore, learn, grow and allow them to blossom into the unique human beings they were born to be. I best do this by providing clear boundaries, unconditional love, support for their learning and security from harm. I just don’t see a place for punishment or fear.

If my child is about to run into the street then I’ll physically stop her and then help her learn of the dangers in whatever language I think she’ll understand. I won’t teach her by wilfully inflicting pain on her. If she does it again I’ll physically keep her away from the street until she’s learned to look out for herself – not as punishment but as protection.

If you are a parent who believes in the need to smack children, then I imagine that you have different parental goals to me or maybe different views about the best way to teach your children.

Phew!

This turned out quite a bit longer than my regular posts and there’s a whole lot more I could say on the subject. Maybe another day! Thank you for staying with it and I’m really curious to see what comments this article might inspire.

UPDATE

If you are inspired by this article you might want to check out my follow-up post on the subject exploring the many alternatives to smacking ‘When smacking seems the only option

Notes

1   I’ve use ’smacking’ as it’s more acceptable to advocates of corporal punishment than ‘hitting’. I guess it implies a strength and style of hitting of less intensity than, for example, punching. We all know, however,  that smacking is a form of hitting.

2   It was not my intention to pick out only examples from Christian sites, they were just the most prominent in Google search, so I assume the most popular.

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

Bridging the empathy gap

UPDATE - 2 January 2009

‘Bridging the empathy gap’ has made it to the next round of voting as the most popular idea in the ‘Government Reform’ section and in the Top 10 most popular ideas overall. Next round of voting starts on 5th January to decide the 10 ideas that will be presented to the new President. I’m very grateful to everyone who supported the idea in the first round and ask that you continue with that support into the second round of voting. Ian

This post is a bit of a departure from normal as it’s a message mainly written by someone else.

It’s a request for your support in bringing a very specific, ‘peace-making’ proposal to the attention of President Elect Barack Obama. I’m excited about this, not only for the idea itself but because it’s done in way where my single vote has a measurable impact on the chances of its success (my own vote moved the counter from 156 to 157 votes casts).

The idea has been developed by some of my friends and colleagues at the Center For Nonviolent Communication and they’re hoping to get overwhelming support for this idea (as a minimum they need around 1,200 votes by 30 December 2008). Even though I’m not American I’m still affected by, and interested in, decisions of the Administration and this approach gives me a voice without interfering.

I invite you to have a look at the copy of the Email below and if you’re drawn to it, then follow the instructions for voting. You might also consider linking to this post, copying it, stealing it, Digging it, Stumbling it, or anything else you can think of that might give it wider attention.

If you’re not drawn to, you can still do the same, just you probably wouldn’t want to vote!

Here’s the message:

We are requesting support for a proposal to begin a movement to increase the empathic ability of those who serve in our government. Literally 4 minutes of your time with only 5 steps to bring an idea before the Obama team that could effect the kind of change we are all hoping to see!

President Elect Barack Obama said, “I will open the doors of government and ask you to be involved in your own democracy again.” Change.org has created a forum that will submit the top ten voted for proposals to the Obama team for review. Ideas for Change in America is a citizen-driven effort to identify and create momentum around the best ideas for how the Obama Administration and Congress can turn the broad call for “change” across the country into specific policies.

We have posted a proposal named “Bridging the Empathy Gap – Yes We Can” designed to make empathy central to government functioning, tying it to Obama’s repeated highlighting of empathy as a crucially needed quality. The proposal is appended at the end of this message for your review.

To make it to the 2nd round of voting on this site, we probably need to have at least 1,200 votes for this idea in the coming week. If you are moved to have this idea brought to the attention of the administration, please take the steps below as soon as possible. Ideas that get a lot of votes quickly are posted as “ideas on the rise” and have more of a chance of getting votes.

  1. Click on: http://www.change.org/ideas/view/bridging_the_empathy_gap_-_yes_we_can (or if the link doesn’t work go to http://www.change.org/ideas and search for this proposal or for “empathy”)
  2. Click on Vote! and a window will open to create an account asking for name, email and a password
  3. Fill in window to create your account
  4. Return to your email to complete registration by clicking on the link provided in the email from change.org
  5. Click on Vote again and you are complete! The “Vote” button will have changed from blue to red and the text will say “Voted”.” It will only let you vote once for each item.

Once you have an account you can invite friends and get them to vote as well.

Our hope/goal/intention is to create an overwhelming response to our proposal so it can get the attention it needs to be brought to fruition.

Thank you for giving your time in this way.

Catherine Cadden, Jori Manske, Kathleen McFerran, Miki Kashtan, Sylvia Haskvitz

HERE’S THE PROPOSAL

Bridging the Empathy Gap – Yes we can!

President-Elect Barack Obama has spoken repeatedly about empathy, which he defines as “the ability to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes; to see the world through those who are different from us.” In his words, “And that strikes me as the most important quality that we need in America right now and around the world right now.” Empathy is a value we can cultivate in our government now.

We propose to create an inter-departmental office of empathy (or a division within a Department of Peace if one is established) that can support the closing of the empathy deficit by employing strategies such as the following:

1. Implementing specific processes and methods for making empathy central to government operations both within government and in every sector of society to support meaningful use of our resources.

2. Identifying specific offices, agencies, and individuals within government that would benefit from intensive training in empathy skills.

3. Utilizing advanced empathic facilitation as a foundation for decision-making to support efficient and productive processes in all branches of goverment.

4. Assessing the impact of government policies and decisions on the overall purpose of bridging the empathy gap.

5. Creating public forums for dialogue to create empathic connection between people across differences – political, religious, ideological, racial, class, etc. The purpose of such forums would be bridging divides in our nation.

6. Creating and proposing curriculum based on Nonviolent Communication (www.cnvc.org) to all schools for teaching empathy skills.

7. Creating an Empathy Corps – volunteers trained in empathy skills to go into conflict zones domestically and internationally to support diffusion of conflict through empathic connection.

Empathy is a quality of character that can change the world.
- President-Elect Barack Obama

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

Latest economic news: Christmas bought in recent takeover activity

If you’re not in the mood for a Christmas rant, I suggest you turn to one of my more positive and upbeat posts. You might want to check back here in a few days when you’ve had enough festiveness. My rant has been building up for a while and had to explode sometime. I guess just before the festival begins is as good a time as any.

Let me say first of all that I really enjoy the Christmas of holiday, family, gifts, pine trees, pretty lights, good food and mulled wine. What I don’t enjoy is the blatant commercial pressure to celebrate in a particular way. The Corporate Way.

It’s hard to avoid the constant bombardment of messages about what Christmas ’should’ look like with its avalanches of snow, expensive gifts and fake smiles. When it’s combined with crystal clear messages about what presents to buy (assuming that you do, in fact, LOVE your children!) then I just want to hide away and only come out when it’s over. I really sympathise with the Grinch and Scrooge.

Leave me alone – I want to be free to celebrate in my own way!!!

I was impressed when I first moved to Eastern Europe in 1994. Decorations started coming out a few days before Christmas and giving gifts was much more a symbolic matter with shops subdued in their promotion of the concept. Kids, generally speaking, received a few small gifts and adults none. The focus was on family gatherings, going to church, eating and celebrating together. I found there to be a real respect when everyone greeted each other with personal wishes spoken face to face rather than written on a garish card. It seemed that generosity was from the heart and not from the pocket.

14 years on and the Corporate Takeover is almost complete. Around mid-October the retail trade starts reminding us of the impending joyful days and the message is clear. Spend! Spend! Spend! A few shops don’t even bother to take down the tinsel and baubles but leave them up. Why remove them when you can use Christmas to encourage people to be buying all year round?

Over recent decades a new Church (of Commercialism) has copied the early Christians and has been stealing Christmas from under our noses. Originally, of course, it was a pagan festival to mark the winter solstice until the early Christian Church cleverly stole it. As they did it so gracefully and so long ago, we’ve accepted Christmas as a mainly Christian festival to celebrate the birth of Jesus, a reasonably important symbol to Christians.

Now it seems the takeover of Christmas is almost complete, with the corporate world mopping up with what might best be described as a ‘re-branding exercise’. It’s become ‘politically incorrect’ to talk about ‘Christmas’ for fear of alienating people of other faith or no faith. After all, non-Christians have money and know how to party too, don’t they? Why should they be excluded from the spending spree? I’m not sure what ‘politics’ has to do with this and it’s more accurate to call it ‘corporately incorrect’.

Even Santa Claus is not exempt from the re-branding. He’s increasingly called ‘Father Christmas’ which I suspect is transitional and a step away from his Catholic roots (Santa = Saint). Clearly ‘Father Xmas’ would be a bigger step on the way to becoming the ‘Festive Parent’. Come to think of it, he’ll only fully meet the high standards of corporate correctness when he gets rid of the kids on his knee and the white beard to become ‘Seasonal Person’. After all, he/she needs to appeal to every single buyer on the planet.

Apparently unconnected, we’ve seen corporate induced climate change destroy many a white Christmas. The ‘good’ news is that it’s done wonders for sales of fake snow, tinsel and white lights. Is it really coincidence that the takeover has gone hand in hand with polluting the Earth? Is climate change part of some evil plan to make us buy more? Hmmmm!

Rant over. Sorry about that, but I do feel a whole lot better.

Finally, here’s my Christmas message.

Christians

Reclaim Christmas as your own and don’t give in to corporate correctness.

Everyone else

Relax, have a good time with your family and party (Christians – you can party too if you want)

Find your own way to celebrate Christmas (or not)


PLEASE! PLEASE! PLEASE!


resist the pressure to ‘Do’ Christmas the Corporate Way

Happy Christmas Everyone!

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

You cannot do anything wrong

In life I make many mistakes and get a lot of stuff ‘wrong’ every day. I’ve lived many years with an idea that getting something ‘wrong’ deserves punishment – physical, emotional or psychological and I decided to change how I think about this concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ I grew up with.

I’m usually my own harshest critic and punish my ‘wrongdoing’ with guilt or embarrassment. Either that or I deny responsibility and point the finger somewhere else, trying to pass blame and shame off my own shoulders and onto someone else’s.

How did I learn this concept of ‘wrong’?

Here some examples:

  • At school when I got something wrong in class I was punished with a low grade (or a couple of times publicly ridiculed)
  • At home when I got something wrong I was slapped (not very hard, I admit), made to feel guilty or educated about my mistake
  • In church (I went until the age of 14) I was taught that if I get it wrong big time (sin) then I’ll head for eternal damnation in the fiery pit
  • When I broke the law then, depending on the seriousness of my ‘wrongdoing’, I got fined (a couple of speeding tickets) or imprisoned (not me – a distant second cousin). In some places they murder ‘wrongdoers’ and call it execution (I live in Europe, so I’m safe from this!)
  • If I listen to the ‘wrong’ music (for example, Celine Dion*) or wear the ‘wrong’ clothes, then I’m punished by my peers by being laughed at (if I was famous, which I’m not, then I’d be a regular subject of sarcastic journalism in the fashion press!).

This way of thinking isn’t serving me. The reality is that I often get stuff ‘wrong’ and beating myself up (or being beaten up) is neither constructive nor healthy. I’m developing a way of thinking and acting where I can’t do anything ‘wrong’ because I don’t have this concept in my head.

I’m talking about the situations where I’m clear I messed up and not the times we just disagree (for example, I think 2+2=5 and you think something different). You know I screwed up, I know it, everyone and her dog knows it. Those situations where my actions have damaging consequences for other people.

For example, I run down the street, bump into you and knock you over. I lie to you, you find out and lose trust in me. I shut myself away and you worry about me because you haven’t heard from me.

My actions (or inactions) always have consequences for other people whether I like it or not. Getting it ‘wrong’ in my new definition means doing something that hurts you (or me) in some way while getting it ‘right’ means contributing to your life in a positive way. If this is the case, why would I ever do something ‘wrong’ in the first place?

There are three reasons I can think of:

1  I’m inherently evil and deserve whatever comes my way

Now I’m not a big fan of this explanation and I think this notion of ‘human-beings-are-all-sinners’ has done enough damage and it’s time we moved on as a species! I put it here because I could be wrong to leave it out and I have no idea what the consequences might be if I don’t include it.

But moving quickly on …

2  I don’t have all the information

Most of what I do is in the conviction that I’m ‘right’ – to the best of my current understanding. But I don’t know everything and I can’t predict the future with any accuracy so I’m often ignorant of the likely consequences of my actions. It turns out from time to time that there are consequences I didn’t know about or information I was missing. If I had known then I probably would have done something different.

As I’m running down the street, concentrating hard on getting to my meeting, I’m unaware of your presence. If I had been, then I’d have slowed down!

3  I didn’t know another way

It happens that I know exactly what the consequences will be but I just don’t know any other way of behaving at the time. If I’d seen an alternative course then I would have taken it.

I was feeling insecure and afraid of telling you the truth and to protect myself I lied. I knew you would find out and stop trusting me but in that moment I didn’t know any other way to feel safe. I would have told the truth if I’d known how to do so and feel secure at the same time.

This is not about making excuses or absolving myself of responsibility. In fact it’s the opposite. It’s about seeing clearly and taking responsibility for the consequences of my actions. I did something that damaged you and I’ve learned. Next time I’ll act differently. I’m not going to beat myself up about it by blaming or punishing myself and if I choose to apologise it will be out of genuine sadness at the results of my action and not motivated by ‘repentance’ thinking.

Isn’t this healthier and more real than going on the attack? Isn’t this a more gentle and loving way to learn from my mistakes?

* I just want to be clear about this. I do NOT enjoy the music of Celine Dion. Despite having one of her albums. But I never listen to it. Honest!
Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites

Plan B for World peace

As I wait for enthusiastic calls from our beloved world leaders following up on my plan for world peace, I was inspired by this article on the BBC News website to come up with ‘Plan B’:

“A Florida pizza delivery man who was challenged by armed robbers in the city of Miramar got in first with his own weapon – a large pepperoni pizza.

Eric Lopez Devictoria, 40, flung the piping hot pizza at the gunman, then turned on his heels and ran. He made a safe getaway, according to the Florida Sun-Sentinel, despite one shot being fired as he fled.

Police later arrested three teenage suspects, who have been charged with armed robbery.”

Eric clearly read my previous post and, not having a paper firearm to hand, used the next best thing. A pizza! Well done Eric for the improvisation.

I guess the police easily identified the suspects from the pepperoni-shaped burn marks on their faces? I haven’t tested the effectiveness of other types of pizza (I hope I’m never required to do so!) but am convinced they would also work. If pepperoni doesn’t suit your taste, or for all the vegetarians out there, then why not arm yourself with a vegetarian pizza?

In the unlikely event that the cardboard gun idea doesn’t fly, the next best thing is to replace all the weapons with pizzas! (this is my Plan B – in case it wasn’t clear!).

Liked this article? Please share it or subscribe.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Add to favorites